Re: [HACKERS] Platforms with v6.3 trouble - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Platforms with v6.3 trouble
Date
Msg-id 199802251519.KAA10778@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Platforms with v6.3 trouble  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> >From what I understand, there are at least two platforms which are
> having trouble with the macro inlining in v6.3. The alpha ports have
> trouble inlining the slock assembler code, and the SCO port has trouble
> inlining the cache lookup code.
>
> Since these macros were inlined only for performance reasons, would it
> be possible to revert to non-inline function calls for these platforms?
> It would seem that substituting a macro expansion for a compiled routine
> could be done with a compiler switch (e.g. USE_INLINING) so it could be
> turned on and off at will.
>
> For most of us, the performance gains are fantastic, but for those ports
> which broke performance has degraded to zero :(

Yes, how do we do that?  Do we have inlined-versions of these files?
Sounds messy.  Can people run cpp separately on the files, then compile
them?  I wonder.  I think this is an SCO-only problem, and seeing as
their native compilers are notoriously buggy (Microsoft/SVr4 code), it
is no wonder.

The alpha problem has been solved by having a s_lock.c file, that only
contains the alpha/linux locking code.  They don't have local asm
labels, and hence the workaround.  I believe this is not a problem issue
for 6.3.  Anyone?  Of course, we still have the initdb problem, or do
we?


--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Open 6.3 issues
Next
From: "Maurice Gittens"
Date:
Subject: Adding a field to each tuple