Re: [HACKERS] fork/exec for backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] fork/exec for backend
Date
Msg-id 199801251544.KAA17802@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
>
>
> > This would also prevent us from attaching to shared memory because it
> > would already be in the address space.
>
> With no exec we could use mmap instead of shm*.
> Have to clock them to see which one is faster first.
> I think the mmap API is cleaner.

Yes, we really only need memory that is not going to be copy-on-write
when you fork.  Both types would do this, but since it would already be
in the address space, there is no speed to measure.  The postmaster is
the only one to do the actual operation.

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter T Mount
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A small type extension example for the contrib directory (fwd)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A small type extension example for the contrib directory (fwd)