Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 1997.1273106197@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> The existing behavior is probably not optimal, but I'm not seeing what
>> benefit we get out of neutering it.

> We get to design it right, or maybe not need it at all in 9.1.

Yeah.  The good thing about a boolean is that it covers the two
noncontroversial cases (no-wait and wait forever), and doesn't lock
us into supporting cases that we don't really know how to do well
yet.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Next
From: Kenneth Marshall
Date:
Subject: construct_array() use with PQexec with binary data