Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> bool
> ! isort(int4 *a, int len)
> {
> bool
> ! isort(int4 *a, const int len)
> {
If VC thinks that that is required to fix a warning, it's too broken to live.
AFAICS what you've got there is a compiler that is being pedantically
strict about language details that it does not actually understand well;
its apparent idea that "const **" means "const * const *" being much in
the same line as this one.
I don't mind the non-const-related parts of this patch, but I recommend
rejecting all the const-decoration changes.
regards, tom lane
