Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks
Date
Msg-id 19870.1523051074@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-04-06 16:59:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But in particular, it's clear that partition_prune and
>> isolation/checksum_cancel are showing big problems.

> While I'm obviously also unhappy about the frantic push to push semi
> baked stuff, I'm not sure the two issues you point to above are that
> good examples of carelessness. At least the latter seems mostly a pretty
> normal portability thing around orderedness?

I'm just venting, perhaps, but if there's a good reason for that
to have been left broken for ~24 hours, I don't know what it is.
It's getting in the way of testing other recent commits.

(I'm also not real happy about the amount of time the checksum-xxx
tests consume.)

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks