Re: portability of "designated initializers" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: portability of "designated initializers"
Date
Msg-id 19848.1227412981@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: portability of "designated initializers"  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: portability of "designated initializers"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: portability of "designated initializers"  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I've already modified your patch a bit ... please send your updated
> patch so I can merge it into mine.  However, my changes were also
> relatively minor.  Since Tom wants it to be entirely rewritten then
> maybe merging minor fixes to it is a waste of time ...

The thing I'm complaining about is having dropped the intermediate
struct that represents the fully decoded set of reloptions.  If you
put that back I won't object to a table-driven approach to doing the
decoding.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: portability of "designated initializers"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: portability of "designated initializers"