Re: [HACKERS] Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra
Date
Msg-id 19820.1510155591@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 10/7/17 16:46, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Accordingly I propose the attached patch.  If anyone's interested in
>> experimenting on other platforms, we might be able to refine/complicate
>> the FLUSH_DISTANCE selection further, but I think this is probably good
>> enough for a first cut.

> What is the status of this?  Is performance on High Sierra still bad?

I committed the fix at 643c27e36.  If Apple have done anything about the
underlying problem, you couldn't tell it from their non-response to my
bug report.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Exclude pg_internal.init from base backup