Re: Reinitialize stack base after fork (for the benefit of rr)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Reinitialize stack base after fork (for the benefit of rr)?
Date
Msg-id 19797.1585335596@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reinitialize stack base after fork (for the benefit of rr)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Reinitialize stack base after fork (for the benefit of rr)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2020-03-27 14:34:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>>> Tom, while imo not a fix of the right magnitude here: Are you planning /
>>> hoping to work again on your postmaster latch patch?

>> Um ... -ESWAPPEDOUT.  What are you thinking of?

> https://postgr.es/m/18193.1492793404%40sss.pgh.pa.us

Oh, I thought we'd dropped that line of thinking in favor of trying
to not do work in the postmaster signal handlers (i.e. I thought *you*
were pushing this forward, not me).

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number