Re: Why does backend send buffer size hardcoded at 8KB? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Why does backend send buffer size hardcoded at 8KB?
Date
Msg-id 19796.1564240146@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why does backend send buffer size hardcoded at 8KB?  (Artemiy Ryabinkov <getlag@ya.ru>)
Responses Re: Why does backend send buffer size hardcoded at 8KB?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-general
Artemiy Ryabinkov <getlag@ya.ru> writes:
> Does it make sense to make this parameter configurable?

Not without some proof that it makes a performance difference on
common setups (which you've not provided).

Even with some proof, I'm not sure I'd bother with exposing a
user-tunable knob, as opposed to just making the buffer bigger.
We have far too many GUCs already.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Artemiy Ryabinkov
Date:
Subject: Why does backend send buffer size hardcoded at 8KB?
Next
From: farjad.farid
Date:
Subject: RE: Hardware for writing/updating 12,000,000 rows per hour