I wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
>> About the XXX: I think resetting inh flag is unnecessary, so we should
>> just remove the line.
> Possibly. I hadn't had time to follow up the XXX annotation.
Now I have ...
Yeah, it seems we can just drop that and leave the flag alone. We'll
end up running through set_append_rel_size and finding no relevant
AppendRelInfos, but that's not going to take long enough to be a problem.
It seems better to have the principle that rte->inh doesn't change after
subquery_planner's initial scan of the rtable, so I'll make it so.
>> If we do that, we can also get rid of the following
>> code in set_rel_size():
No, we can't --- that's still reachable if somebody says
"SELECT FROM ONLY partitioned_table".
regards, tom lane
