Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)
Date
Msg-id 19679.1359397216@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Now that I've written this in that email, I think I'm going to go for
> the new command. But maybe we have some precedent for objects that we
> list in pg_dump only for solving several steps dependency lookups?

Yes, pg_dump has lots of objects that might not appear in a dump.
The most recent examples are the section fence objects ...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Phil Sorber
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Next
From: yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
Date:
Subject: Re: SYSV shared memory vs mmap performance