Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?
Date
Msg-id 19679.1067319309@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> Only regproc adds the unnecessary pg_catalog. qualification, why is that?

Er, I couldn't see the part of your example where that happened?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Open items
Next
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicating transaction information in indexes and