Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I thought this might be new because of my upgrade to BSD/OS 4.3, but I
> just checked my 4.2 machine and it also doesn't have tzname. Seems this
> might be the first time we are referencing tzname if struct tm already
> exists. Can we switch to a struct tm/tzname solution?
Don't see how --- tzset doesn't return a struct tm. We may have to just
not make the test on machines without tzname[]. Grotty, but they're no
worse off than before...
regards, tom lane
