Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Date
Msg-id 1964.1275659359@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Shouldn't we have bumped the catversion? The installers can't tell
>> that beta1 clusters won't work with beta2 :-(

> That is an interesting point.  Tom bumped the pg_control version, but
> not the catalog version.

Right, because the catalog contents didn't change.  Seems to me you'd
better teach the installers to look at PG_CONTROL_VERSION too.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Did we really want to force an initdb in beta2?
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronization levels in SR