Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used
Date
Msg-id 19631.1363316438@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> [ format-width-20130305.patch ]

Applied with some mostly-cosmetic adjustments.  I also took the liberty
of changing some of the error message texts to line up more closely
with the expanded documentation (eg, use "format specifier" not
"conversion specifier" because that's the phrase used in the docs).
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Assertion failure when promoting node by deleting recovery.conf and restart node
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)