Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
Date
Msg-id 19627.984720211@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> My question was what are we needing to test?  If we can do only single writes
> to the log, don't we prefer O_* to fsync, and the O_D* options over
> plain O_*?  Am I confused?

I don't think we have enough data to conclude that with any certainty.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ryan@paymentalliance.net
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL Search Engine - searchraw.php3 (1/1)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC