Dmitry Tkach <dmitry@openratings.com> writes:
> Explain analyze says:
> Limit (cost=61.91..61.91 rows=1 width=192) (actual time=439435.47..439435.50 rows=10 loops=1)
> -> Sort (cost=61.91..61.91 rows=1 width=192) (actual time=439435.47..439435.48 rows=11 loops=1)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..61.90 rows=1 width=192) (actual time=7589.68..439423.75 rows=110 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan using managed_supplier_idx on managed_supplier ms (cost=0.00..22.02 rows=5 width=157)
(actualtime=6.72..3009.90 rows=14365 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan using tradestyle_duns_idx on tradestyle ts (cost=0.00..6.97 rows=1 width=35) (actual
time=30.34..30.37rows=0 loops=14365)
> Total runtime: 439436.45 msec
Judging from the tiny cost estimates, the planner thinks these tables
are tiny. Have you done a VACUUM ANALYZE lately?
regards, tom lane
