Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi�:
>> Doesn't seem quite right. Should we throw error if the number of 9's
>> before the decimal point isn't 1?
> No, see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4A68FAE4.50206@timbira.com
Ah, nothing like being bug-compatible with a bad implementation.
But I agree, if Oracle ignores the number of 9's there then we
should too.
BTW, this patch adds more NUM_cache_remove() calls. I'm planning
to commit it that way, unless you're just about to commit your PG_TRY
change? I agree with doing that, but figured it should be a separate
commit.
regards, tom lane