Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix
Date
Msg-id 19552.1168221814@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps even more to the point, what makes you think that someone
>> will notice the warning?  If the docs build is one step in an
>> automated build process, this seems unlikely.

> Taking a closer look, it's pretty much guaranteed that no one will see
> them, because the targets they are attached to are intermediate,
> normally followed by latex runs.

If we think this is a problem, ISTM the correct answer is to just force
a repeat jade run when doing "make all".  The only objection to that
AFAICS is that when you're doing docs work and only need a draft to
look at, you'd rather it not run twice.  But perhaps we could address
that by providing a separate target, "make draft" say, that runs jade
but once.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: catch warnings
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Full page writes