Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
Date
Msg-id 19524.1296228948@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>>> Agreed. I submitted the patch before, but I forgot to update it
>>>> and add it to CF.
>>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTimuHbxbuM+zLkaEX3aDqSeiMUE3xb4ww1QtsLmf@mail.gmail.com
>> 
>> Great!

> I hate to be a wet blanket, but the number of patches in this CF is
> going the wrong direction.

Yes.  I'm not sure that the fact that something was discussed months ago
entitles the submitter to a free exemption from the requirement to meet
the CF submission deadline.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: mingw64
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting