Re: CommitFest status/management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: CommitFest status/management
Date
Msg-id 19492.1259640499@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CommitFest status/management  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: CommitFest status/management
Re: CommitFest status/management
Re: CommitFest status/management
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> As I have observed before, I think we need some infrastructure to help 
> committers claim items, so we don't duplicate work.

Robert acknowledged the need for a "claimed by committer" field in the
fest application, but he hasn't got round to it yet.  In the meantime
I've been adding a "Taking this one..." type of comment to an entry
I want to claim.

> I'm going to look at the YAML format for EXPLAIN patch shortly.

Do we have consensus yet that we want YAML?  It seemed, well,
yet another format without all that much advantage over what's
there.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SE-PgSQL patch review
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: CommitFest status/management