Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Date
Msg-id 19492.1120146487@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> That's controlled by pg_hba.conf though, isn't it?  The idea being that
> you'd like to give some people the ability to create users/roles, but to
> limit the databases those created users/roles could connect to by, say,
> requiring they have 'usage' or 'connect' permissions to that database,
> which could be set by the database owner; without the database owner
> having write permissions to the pg_hba.conf.

You can do that today by putting a group name in pg_hba.conf.  Roles
will make it more flexible; I don't see that we need anything more.

For instance, if pg_hba.conf says "samegroup" then you could manage
everything by associating a group with each database.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles