Re: make check failure for 8.4.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: make check failure for 8.4.0
Date
Msg-id 19488.1247938875@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: make check failure for 8.4.0  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Bingo!  A few weeks back I had been experimenting with using the PGXS
> compiles for our extensions, rather than expanding our tarballs in the
> build tree and just doing make and sudo make install there.  On the
> failing machine, the session I used has USE_PGXS defined.

Hah.  I wonder whether it's possible for an in-tree build to
intentionally undefine that?  We could do something likeoverride USE_PGXS :=
in contrib/Makefile but I'm not sure if that results in the
variable being "undefined".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alan Li
Date:
Subject: Re: MIN/MAX optimization for partitioned table
Next
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: make check failure for 8.4.0