Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Date
Msg-id 19487.1467242518@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Thanks for investigating!  I'll go commit that change.  I wish someone
>> would put up a buildfarm critter using VS2013, though.

> Uh, isn't that what woodlouse is using?

Well, it wasn't reporting this crash, so there's *something* different.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels