Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
Date
Msg-id 19458.1405899435@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
List pgsql-bugs
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-07-20 19:11:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wonder whether we should change vac_update_relstats so that it only
>> applies the "relminxid mustn't go backwards" rule as long as relminxid
>> is sane, ie, not in the future.  If it is in the future, forcibly update
>> it to the cutoff we actually used.  Likewise for relminmxid.  And I guess
>> we'd need a similar rule for updating datmin(m)xid.

> I'm wondering the same. How would we do that from a concurreny POV for
> the pg_database rows? I think we could just accept the race condition
> that two xacts move dbform->datminmxid backwards to different values
> since both have to be 'somewhat' correct?

Seems no worse than it is today.  Is it even possible for two xacts to be
trying to update that at the same time?

> I think this is out of the remit for 9.3.5. At least I don't have the
> mental capacity to do this properly till tomorrow afternoon.

Doesn't sound that hard to me (and I'm still reasonably awake, which
I bet you're not).  Will take a look.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts