Re: Concurrent psql patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Concurrent psql patch
Date
Msg-id 19434.1180033474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Concurrent psql patch  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Concurrent psql patch  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> If we're going to include libpq-int.h maybe we need to put it in
> common.h. Is there a reason that our own client programs shouldn't use
> our own library internals?

Seems like a really bad idea to me.  I know I've cursed mysql more than
once for doing the equivalent.  Also, if psql needs more than is
currently exported as official API, why wouldn't other programs need it
too?  If there's more needed here, let's see an official API change,
not a hack.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch