Re: [HACKERS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.) - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)
Date
Msg-id 19409.1391842262@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> writes:
> How about adding URL's for the online versions of HISTORY & README's (or
> their rough equivalents - perhaps the online version of the latest
> 'Appendix E. Release Notes' would be sufficient?) to the INSTALL file?

Actually, what I had in mind was to replace the dynamically-generated
HISTORY and README files with small text files that contain those
URL references.  If we remove those files from the distribution
tarballs altogether, it'd likely break some packagers' recipes
(I know for sure it'd break the Red Hat RPM specs, for instance).
But packaging should still work if they're there but smaller.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)