Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla
Subject Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?
Date
Msg-id 193a9d2a981.d32b5f0730162.4362483220557140648@zohocorp.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?  (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view




---- On Sun, 08 Dec 2024 18:23:21 +0530 Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote ---

Hi Srinath,

On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 at 11:17, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla
<srinath.reddy@zohocorp.com> wrote:
> > ---- On Fri, 06 Dec 2024 16:40:51 +0530 Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote ---
> > LGTM.
>
> sorry i didn't get,what you meant to say is the assert failure which i said is correct and does my patch to this looks good?🤔

Sorry if I was not clear. Yes, I wanted to say what you said is
correct and the patch looks good to me.

--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Disallow UPDATE/DELETE on table with unpublished generated column as REPLICA IDENTITY
Next
From: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla
Date:
Subject: Fwd: Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?