Re: Big 7.1 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date
Msg-id 19330.962057022@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Big 7.1 open items  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
> Do we need *both* database & tablespace to find table file ?!
> Imho, database shouldn't be used...

That'd work fine for me, but I think Bruce was arguing for paths that
included the database name.  We'd end up with paths that go something
like..../data/tablespaces/TABLESPACEOID/RELATIONOID
(plus some kind of decoration for segment and version), so you'd have
a hard time telling which files in a tablespace belong to which
database.  Doesn't bother me a whole lot, personally --- if one wants
to know that one could just as well assign separate tablespaces to
different databases.  They're only subdirectories anyway...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: C exception code
Next
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: RE: Big 7.1 open items