Re: max relations in a single database - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: max relations in a single database
Date
Msg-id 19264.1027266819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max relations in a single database  (Ralph Graulich <maillist@shauny.de>)
Responses Re: max relations in a single database  (Ralph Graulich <maillist@shauny.de>)
List pgsql-general
Ralph Graulich <maillist@shauny.de> writes:
> While importing the dump file I get the following message on my logfile:
> RTERangeTablePosn: RTE not found (internal error)

Oh?

> I traced that back to a CREATE VIEW statement:

> CREATE VIEW horse_exported_imported_by_year_country
> AS
> .
> .
> .

> If I copy'n'paste this definition by hand it tells me that it truncates
> the identifier:

> NOTICE:  identifier "horse_exported_imported_by_year_country" will be
> truncated to "horse_exported_imported_by_year"

> Can this cause any error as listed above?

No, I don't think so.  Can you post a self-contained example for someone
else to try?  I'm still suspicious of flaky hardware, but ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ralph Graulich
Date:
Subject: Re: max relations in a single database
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: max relations in a single database