Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Date
Msg-id 19249.1280339214@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> writes:
> Howard Rogers, 28.07.2010 03:58:
>> For what it's worth, I wrote up the performance comparison here:
>> http://diznix.com/dizwell/archives/153

> Very interesting reading.

Indeed.

> Would you mind sharing the tables, index structures and search queries that you used (both for Oracle and Postgres)?

What I'd be interested in is EXPLAIN ANALYZE results.  In particular,
I wonder if the planner was switching from indexscan to seqscan plans
for the cases where many rows would be returned, and if so whether it
got the cutover point right.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bryan Hinton
Date:
Subject: Re: How Big is Too Big for Tables?
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Want FUNCTION to return argv[0] thru argv[6]