Re: regression failures - further data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers-win32

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: regression failures - further data
Date
Msg-id 1922.24.211.141.25.1083894877.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: regression failures - further data  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: regression failures - further data
List pgsql-hackers-win32
Tom Lane said:
> "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> No, this is running with the patch that suppresses that. Basically,
>> for some reason that I have been unable to find, and which leaves no
>> log trace, copy just stops after about 4 or 5 lines, and then there
>> are a bunch of consequent failures. I can't account for it yet. All I
>> do know is that it happens when the tests are run with high
>> parallelism and doesn't with no or low parallelism.
>
> That seems *really weird*.  When you say "stops after 4 or 5 lines", do
> you mean that the first few rows of the source data get committed
> successfully, but the rest don't?
>

Er, no :-) I mean the first few lines of source code ... around where it
does the "delete from onek". It's not entirely consistent. I'm playing
with debugging etc. in the postmaster log to get further and better
particulars.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers-win32 by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: regression failures - further data
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: regression failures - further data