c k <shreeseva.learning@gmail.com> writes:
> what will be the reason for this?
The short answer is that || uses cast-to-text semantics, whereas concat
uses output-function semantics, and char(n) is one of the weird types
for which those are different. Don't blame us, blame the SQL committee.
Or rather than blaming anybody, stop using char(n); it's a badly
defined data type, and there are almost no cases where varchar or text
isn't preferable.
regards, tom lane
