Re: Extended protocol logging - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extended protocol logging
Date
Msg-id 19138.1162393609@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extended protocol logging  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> With what logging settings?  log_duration has rather different behavior
>> from what it used to do.

> I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test program
> in the protocol section,

The contents of the postmaster log are surely not part of the FE protocol.
Clients can't even see the log without resorting to nonstandard hacks.

What it sounds like to me is that Dave's client has got log_duration = ON
when what he should have is log_min_duration_statement = 0.  Those two
settings used to be just about redundant but as of 8.2 they have got
distinct functionality.  See this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg00681.php
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: imad
Date:
Subject: Re: ¿¿¿past chunk end???
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: ¿¿¿pas