Re: Linux start script updates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Linux start script updates
Date
Msg-id 19091.1267463078@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux start script updates  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Linux start script updates
List pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Exactly.  With Fedora respecting the standard in this regard, I'm
> convinced we should, too.  In reviewing things based on Peter's
> question, I did start to have doubts about *not* special-casing
> "status" -- it has its own set of values and 5 is not assigned, so
> using it seems wrong.  It seems like it should be 3 ("program is not
> running").  Agreed?

Probably.  I think that in practice most scripts are not very tense
about this --- as long as the exit code is 0 or not-0 per spec, which
not-0 value is reported is not so exciting to most people.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux start script updates
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration