Re: still gin index creation takes forever - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: still gin index creation takes forever
Date
Msg-id 19090.1226598428@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: still gin index creation takes forever  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Responses Re: still gin index creation takes forever  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-general
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes:
>> We could extend IndexBuildHeapScan's API to support that, but I'm
>> not quite convinced that this is the issue.

> That extension might be useful for bitmap index too to simplify index creation
> process.

Maybe, but in any case the measurable GIN speed penalty justifies
changing it; I've applied a patch for that.  I'm still not quite
convinced that Ivan isn't seeing some other issue though.

In the meantime, I noticed something odd while experimenting with your
test case: when running with default maintenance_work_mem = 16MB,
there is a slowdown of 3x or 4x for the un-ordered case, just as you
say.  But at maintenance_work_mem = 200MB I see very little difference.
This doesn't make sense to me --- it seems like a larger workspace
should result in more difference because of greater chance to dump a
lot of tuples into the index at once.  Do you know why that's happening?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Duffy"
Date:
Subject: Re: simple COPY FROM issue
Next
From: "Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz"
Date:
Subject: Re: sort_mem param of postgresql.conf