Re: TESTING (was: RE: More vacuum.c refactoring ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: TESTING (was: RE: More vacuum.c refactoring )
Date
Msg-id 19017.1086991531@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TESTING (was: RE: More vacuum.c refactoring )  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com> writes:
>> It was done and we fixed a couple of bugs based on it (the 
>> one I can think of offhand had to do with semantics of 
>> aggregate functions in sub-selects).  I don't think there's 
>> anything more to be learned there.

> It is reassuring to know that it passed with flying colors.

"Passed with flying colors" might be overstating it --- but the other
things it found were stuff we already knew about, eg, unimplemented
features, identifier case folding, that kind of thing.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Darcy Buskermolen
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Clean up generation of default
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Tablespaces