-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> wow! so now that people knows about us *is* the better time to change the name?
> why? for keeping people away because they will think that we "are not
> PostgreSQL but maybe some kind of strange fork called Postgres"?
Um...it's already *very* widely known as Postgres. I don't think
anyone out there considers Postgres a "fork" of PostgreSQL. (although
it's tempting at times to create one :)
> while i prefer the name postgres because it's more easy to pronounce
> for non native english speakers
Right. For English speakers as well.
> if we change the name we lose history in the mind of people that
> doesn't know the project so closely to know that this thread appears
> every often...
I'm not sure what you mean by this - people would not make the association
of Postgres <=> PostgreSQL, an already very strong link?
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001261041
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAktfDUcACgkQvJuQZxSWSsg4OQCcDrUDeXNTzfM8xAp75ZJCMwD3
EzwAnjwPBug1JmnqCPpiCYfjG1IVrY0x
=rHRE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
