Re: [pgsql-www] 8.2.0 pdf - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [pgsql-www] 8.2.0 pdf
Date
Msg-id 18994.1165687060@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-www] 8.2.0 pdf  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-www] 8.2.0 pdf  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> Also, if PDF indexes depend on HTML, perhaps HTML should be a
>> dependency of PDF in the Makefile.

> By that logic, HTML should also depend on HTML.  I don't know how people
> would like that.

The real point is that the "jade" step needs to be done twice to have
up-to-date indexes.  It makes sense not to force that for html, because
we use html for proofing.  But perhaps we ought to run jade twice in the
Makefile rule for producing pdftex output?  I see that the Makefile
forces three runs of TeX for similar reasons (which is probably way more
time than the jade part anyway).

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] 8.2.0 pdf
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Switching to XML