Re: BUG #19438: segfault with temp_file_limit inside cursor - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #19438: segfault with temp_file_limit inside cursor
Date
Msg-id 1897027.1774837151@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #19438: segfault with temp_file_limit inside cursor  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #19438: segfault with temp_file_limit inside cursor
List pgsql-bugs
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> Fair. Maybe worth a short comment in the code to explain why we don't
> use the same elevel then? Just considering someone stumbling upon the
> variation in the future and reporting or asking why, and us having to
> dig up the reason why in the archives to answer them.
> Maybe something like this?

Works for me.  I'm done for the day but will make it so tomorrow.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19438: segfault with temp_file_limit inside cursor
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #19442: PL/pgSQL: domain over composite type bypasses type validation when assigning NULL (PostgreSQL 18.3)