Re: more i18n/l10n issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: more i18n/l10n issues
Date
Msg-id 18954.1064929612@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more i18n/l10n issues  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> [ some fair points ]

I've asked the Red Hat folks who did the detail design to respond to
this.  I'm not sure if they had specific use-cases in mind for those 
behaviors, or were just trying to make the feature useful for manual
invocation.  I would think the GUI tool doesn't need most of those
behaviors, but can't swear to it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: GPL code issue?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] plpgsql doesn't coerce boolean expressions to