Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with
Date
Msg-id 18930.1062103559@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
>> Hmmm I think there's still something missing here. I was using pg_restore -r
>> (actually I was using -L but the list was originally generated with -r) which
>> seemed like a good idea at the time. Rereading it now it seems like it
>> shouldn't change anything because it says "This option is the default":

Actually, your real problem is that the documentation of -r bears no
relationship whatever to what the code really does :-(

I have attempted to improve it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: bug with constraint dependencies? or bug with
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bumping block size to 16K on FreeBSD...