Re: regular expressions stranges - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: regular expressions stranges
Date
Msg-id 18916.1169566020@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: regular expressions stranges  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes:
>> The regex code is working with pg_wchar strings, which aren't
>> necessarily the same representation that the OS' wide-char functions
>> expect.  If we could guarantee compatibility then the above plan
>> would make sense ...

> it seems to me, that is possible for UTF8 encoding.

Why?  The one thing that a wchar certainly is not is UTF8.
It might be that the <wctype.h> functions are expecting UTF16 or UTF32,
but we don't know which, and really we can hardly even be sure they're
expecting Unicode at all.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: regular expressions stranges
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Updateable cursors