Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date
Msg-id 18895.1502996341@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I rebased the patch to HEAD.  PFA a new version of the patch.

> Tom, you were instrumental in identifying what was going wrong here
> initially.  Any chance you'd be willing to have a look at the patch?

I will, but probably not for a week or so.  Going eclipse-chasing.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] expanding inheritance in partition bound order