Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Date
Msg-id 18876.1193154279@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> If we were doing it from scratch I would suggest using longer names. At the
>> least I would still suggest using "ascii" or "asciiword" instead of "aword".

> +1 for asciiword; "aword" sounds too much like "a word" which is not the
> meaning I think we're trying to convey.

OK, so with that and Michael's suggestion we have
asciiwordwordnumword
asciihwordhwordnumhword
hword_asciiparthword_parthword_numpart

Sold?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing