"Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Returning to my upthread thought that
>>> I think we should fix it so that \. that's not alone on a line
>>> throws an error, but I wouldn't go further than that.
>> here's a quick follow-on patch to make that happen. It could
>> probably do with a test case to demonstrate the error, but
>> I didn't bother yet pending approval that we want to do this.
> +1 for fixing.
It's been on the thread for awhile now without objections,
so I'll go ahead and make that happen.
regards, tom lane
