Re: [PATCHES] COPYable logs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] COPYable logs
Date
Msg-id 18840.1187542724@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] COPYable logs  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] COPYable logs  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> If these prove difficult, I'd say 24K would put us in an equivalent 
> position (two extra copies of the error message plus change). Even so, 
> I'm inclined to say that 8K is very tight.

We really only care about being able to deliver an "out of memory during
error recovery" message within that space.  So yes, you can assume the
message text isn't huge and there isn't any add-on context info to worry
about.  But there could be localization and/or encoding translation costs.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] COPYable logs
Next
From: "Webb Sprague"
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT/SELECT and excessive foreign key checks