Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> writes:
> Now when checking for shortening of leaf tuple is added LongValuesOK
> become slightly redundant. I'd propose to replace it with more legible name
> as LongValuesOK doesn't mean they are warranted to be ok just that we can
> try to shorten them? What about tryShortening, trySuffixing or
> can(Try)ShortenTuple?
That field name is part of the opclass API. I fear it's several years
too late to rename it for no compelling reason.
regards, tom lane
