Re: Trouble with replication - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Greco
Subject Re: Trouble with replication
Date
Msg-id 187F6C10D2931A4386EE8E58E13857F6303FC87E@BY2PRD0811MB415.namprd08.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Trouble with replication  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general

 

 

From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael.paquier@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 9:43 PM
To: David Greco
Cc: John R Pierce; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Trouble with replication

 

 

 

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:23 AM, David Greco <David_Greco@harte-hanks.com> wrote:

On the master or on the slave, or on both? I thought shipping the archived WAL files from the master to the slave did this already?

In your case you need to transfer the WAL files using streaming replication, so you need to set wal_keep_segments to a value high enough on master such as the slave can can up. For reference:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/runtime-config-replication.html

--
Michael

 

 

 

That document mentions “(However, the standby server can recover by fetching the segment from archive, if WAL archiving is in use.)”. That appears to be my problem, that is not actually occurring in my case.

 

 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Greco
Date:
Subject: Re: Trouble with replication
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Synchronous Replication in production