Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET
Date
Msg-id 18633.1587129736@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET  (Jeremy Morton <postgres@game-point.net>)
Responses Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET  (Jeremy Morton <admin@game-point.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeremy Morton <postgres@game-point.net> writes:
> Surely the fact that you'll lose data if you try to store a common 
> .NET datatype with any kind of ORM (eg. EF, which is pretty popular) 
> right now, using "the world's most advanced open source relational 
> database", is reason enough to support it?

If the ORM somehow prevents you from using timestamptz, that's a
bug in the ORM.  If it doesn't, the above is just a hysterical
claim with no factual foundation.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications